Impact of high-performance work systems in the innovation behavior - creative self-efficacy as an intermediate variable (A comparative Analytical study in public and private Higher Education sector)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the effect of high-performance work systems in the innovation behavior through creative self-efficacy as an intermediate variable, The Conceptual framework and hypotheses development were built based on main variables of the study. The Higher Education sector (public and private)was selected,as an applied for testing the hypotheses of this study.The questionnaire a method was used to collect data from two samples the first sample in the public sector was (361) employees, and the second sample in the private sector was (259) employees.The study reached a number of conclusions there is a positive indirect impact of high-performance work systems in innovation behavior through creative self-efficacy, as well as a direct positive effect of high-performance work systems in creative self-efficacy, The results also showed there is a direct positive effect of creative self-efficacy in innovation behavior, Based on the results obtained it has been proposed a number of recommendations.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
References
Abbott, D. H. (2010). Constructing a creative self-efficacy inventory: A mixed methods inquiry. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Abdullah, N. H., Wahab, E., & Shamsuddin, A. (2019). Creative self-efficacy, innovative work behaviour and job performance among selected manufacturing employees. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5(2), 291-297.
Ajila, C., & Abiola, A. (2004). Influence of rewards on workers performance in an organization. Journal of social sciences, 8(1), 7-12.
Akbari, M., Bagheri, A., Imani, S., & Asadnezhad, M. (2021). Does entrepreneurial leadership encourage innovation work behavior? The mediating role of creative self-efficacy and support for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 1-22.
Akmal, m., & mehmood, k. k. (2022). the influence of person job fit on innovative work behavior through intrinsic motivation and creative self-efficacy. bulletin of business and economics (BBE), 331-341.
Al-Chawishli, Saad & Sourchi, Shirzad. (2022). empirical investigation the impact of employee perceived (HPWS) on employee innovation as Related to creative self-efficacy. International journal of health sciences.
AlEssa, H. S., & Durugbo, C. M. (2022). Systematic review of innovative work behavior concepts and contributions. Management Review Quarterly, 72(4), 1171-1208.
Almheiri, M. M. O., & Omar, R. (2022). Leadership Styles and Competitive Advantage: Does Employee Creativity Mediate the Relationship. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 106-124.
Alnidawi, A.B & Omran, F.M. (2018). The impact of thinking strategies on the employees' creative behavior in insurance companies in Jordan. IJER, 9(6), 10-22.
Amanda Christensen-Salem, Fred O. Walumbwa, Corwin I-Chieh Hsu, Everlyne Misati, Mayowa T. Babalola & Kowoon Kim (2020): Unmasking the creative selfefficacy– creative performance relationship: the roles of thriving at work, perceived work significance, and task interdependence, The International Journal of Human Resource Management,
Ananthram, S., Xerri, M. J., Teo, S. T., & Connell, J. (2018). High-performance work systems and employee outcomes in Indian call centres: a mediation approach. Personnel Review, 47(4), 931-950.
Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., Kalleberg, A. L., & Bailey, T. A. (2000).Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 73(3), 265-285.
Bagheri, A., Newman, A., & Eva, N. (2022). Entrepreneurial leadership of CEOs and employees’ innovative behavior in high-technology new ventures. Journal of Small Business Management, 60(4), 805-827.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
Bashir, M. J. K., Tao, G. H., Abu Amr, S. S., & Tan, K. W. (2018). Public concerns and behaviors towards solid waste minimization using composting in Kampar district, Malaysia. Global NEST Journal, 20(2), 316-323.
Beltrán‐Martín, I., Bou‐Llusar, J. C., Roca‐Puig, V., & Escrig‐Tena, A. B. (2017). The relationship between high performance work systems and employee proactive behaviour: role breadth self‐efficacy and flexible role orientation as mediating mechanisms. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(3), 403-422.
Bhat, Z. H., & Rainayee, R. A. (2019). Examining the mediating role of person–job fit in the relationship between training and performance: A civil servant perspective. Global Business Review, 20(2), 529-548.
Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM–firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of management review, 29(2), 203-221.
Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2009). Research and theory on high‐performance work systems: progressing the high‐involvement stream. Human resource management journal, 19(1), 3-23.
Cappelli, P., & Newmark, D. (1999). D High Perfrmance Wrk Practices Imprve Establish-Level utcmes.
Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders' and other referents' normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35-48.
Chatozoylou, P., et al, (2015), Factors affecting the intention to use eGovernment services, Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, pp. 1489–1498.
Chi, N. W., & Lin, C. Y. Y. (2011). Beyond the high‐performance paradigm: exploring the curvilinear relationship between high‐performance work systems and organizational performance in Taiwanese manufacturing firms. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(3), 486-514.
Chi, N. W., & Lin, C. Y. Y. (2011). Beyond the high‐performance paradigm: exploring the curvilinear relationship between high‐performance work systems and organizational performance in Taiwanese manufacturing firms. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(3), 486-514.
Chiang, Y. H., Hsu, C. C., & Shih, H. A. (2015). Experienced high performance work system, extroversion personality, and creativity performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32, 531-549.
Cox, A., Zagelmeyer, S., & Marchington, M. (2006). Embedding employee involvement and participation at work. Human Resource Management Journal, 16(3), 250-267.
De Jong, J.P.J. and Den Hartog, D.N. (2007), "How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 41-64.
Evans, W. R., & Davis, W. D. (2005). High-performance work systems and organizational performance: The mediating role of internal social structure. Journal of management, 31(5), 758-775.
Eyisi, D. (2016). The usefulness of qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in researching problem-solving ability in science education curriculum. Journal of education and practice, 7(15), 91-100.
Faraz, N. A., Mughal, M. F., Ahmed, F., Raza, A., & Iqbal, M. K. (2019). The impact of servant leadership on employees’ innovative work behaviour-mediating role of psychological empowerment. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 5(3), 10-21.
Farrukh, M., Khan, M. S., Raza, A., & Shahzad, I. A. (2021). Influence of high-performance work systems on intrapreneurial behavior. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management.
Field, A. (2009). Discopering Statistics Using SPSS, Thrid Edition.
Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Bosak, J., Morris, T., & O'Regan, P. (2015). How do high performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms?. Employee Relations, 37(2), 209-231.
Ghafoor, A., Qureshi, T. M., Azeemi, H. R., & Hijazi, S. T. (2011). Mediating role of creative self-efficacy. African Journal of Business Management, 5(27), 11093.
Guest, D (2007) HRM: Towards a new psychological contract, in (eds) P Boxall, J Purcell and P Wright, Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management, Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., and Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Pearson prentice Hall.
Han, J. H., Liao, H., Taylor, M. S., & Kim, S. (2018). Effects of high‐performance work systems on transformational leadership and team performance: Investigating the moderating roles of organizational orientations. Human Resource Management, 57(5), 1065-1082.
Hauff, S., Alewell, D., & Hansen, N. K. (2018). Further exploring the links between high-performance work practices and firm performance: A multiple-mediation model in the German context. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(1), 5-26.
Heller, F., Pusic´, E., Strauss, G. and Wilpert, B. (1998). Organizational Participation – Myth and Reality, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and organizational psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
Jiang, W., & Gu, Q. (2017). Leader creativity expectations motivate employee creativity: A moderated mediation examination. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(5), 724-749.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 765.
Jyoti, J., & Dev, M. (2015). The impact of transformational leadership on employee creativity: the role of learning orientation. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 9(1), 78-98.
Kamna, D. F., & Ilkhanizadeh, S. (2022). Can high-performance work practices influence employee career competencies? There is a need for better employee outcomes in the banking industry. PloS one, 17(3), e0264764.
Karatepe, O. M., & Olugbade, O. A. (2016). The mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between high-performance work practices and job outcomes of employees in Nigeria. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(10), 2350-2371.
Karwowski, M. (2011). The Creative Mix? Teacher’s Creative Leadership School Creative Climate and Students’ Creative Self-Efficacy. Chowanna, (36 (1)), 25-43.
Kerr, A. W., Hall, H. K., & Kozub, A. K. (2002). Doing Statistics with SPSS. Sage Publications, London.
Krause, D. E. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation. The leadership quarterly, 15(1),79-102.
Lepak, D. P., Liao, H., Chung, Y., & Harden, E. E. (2006). A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. Research in personnel and human resources management, 217-271.
Li, C. R., Yang, Y., Lin, C. J., & Xu, Y. (2021). Within‐person Relationship between Creative Self‐efficacy and Individual Creativity: The Mediator of Creative Process Engagement and the Moderator of Regulatory Focus. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 63-78.
Lichtman, M. (2013). Qualitative Research in Education: A User’s Guide. (3rd ed). USA: SAGE Publication.
Lord, D., & Mannering, F. (2010). The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 44(5), 291-305.
Luu, T. T. (2019). Service-oriented high-performance work systems and service-oriented behaviours in public organizations: the mediating role of work engagement. Public Management Review, 21(6), 789-816.
Ma, Z., Gong, Y., Long, L., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Team-level high-performance work systems, self-efficacy and creativity: differential moderating roles of person–job fit and goal difficulty. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(2), 478-511.
Mareschal, P. M. (2003). Solving problems and transforming relationships: The bifocal approach to mediation. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(4), 423-448.
Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2004). Human resource management: international Student Edition.South-Western. Thomson.
Mathisen, G. E., & Bronnick, K. S. (2009). Creative self-efficacy: An intervention study. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(1), 21-29. Mehmood, S. (2016). Impact of ethical leadership on employee creativity: Mediating role of trust and moderating role of creative self-efficacy. Jinnah Business Review, 4(2), 65-74.
Messersmith, J. G., & Guthrie, J. P. (2010). High performance work systems in emergent organizations: Implications for firm performance. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 49(2), 241-264.
Miao, R., Lu, L., Cao, Y., & Du, Q. (2020). The high-performance work system, employee voice, and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological safety. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(4), 1150.
Michaelis, B., Wagner, J. D., & Schweizer, L. (2015). Knowledge as a key in the relationship between high-performance work systems and workforce productivity. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1035-1044.
Muduli, A., & McLean, G. N. (2021). Training transfer climate: examining the role of high performance work system and organizational performance in the power sector of India. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(1), 291-306.
Mumford, M. D. (2002). Social innovation: Ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 253–266.
Nadeem, K., Riaz, A., & Danish, R. Q. (2019). Influence of high-performance work system on employee service performance and OCB: the mediating role of resilience. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 1-13.
Ng, T. W., & Lucianetti, L. (2016). Within-individual increases in innovative behavior and creative, persuasion, and change self-efficacy over time: A social–cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 14.
Ng, T. W., Shao, Y., Koopmann, J., Wang, M., Hsu, D. Y., & Yim, F. H. (2022). The effects of idea rejection on creative self‐efficacy and idea generation: Intention to remain and perceived innovation importance as moderators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 146-163.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B. A., & Wright, P. M. (2007). Fundamentals of human resource management. Creating and Maintaining High-Performance Organizations, New York, Americas ,pp. 493.
Oladapo, V., & Onyeaso, G. (2013). An empirical investigation of sub dimensions of high performance work systems that predict organizational innovation. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 6(1), 67-79.organizational performance? Perspective of a healthcare industry in Taiwan”, The International
Pahos, N., & Galanaki, E. (2018). Staffing practices and employee performance: the role of age. Evidence-Based HRM. In A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship.
Pahos, N., & Galanaki, E. (2022). Performance effects of high performance work systems on committed, long-term employees: A multilevel study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 825397
Pham, L. (2022). High-Performance Work Systems and Employees’ Creativity In Vietnam: The Role Of Employees’ Creative Self-Efficacy And Organizational Contexts.
Phelan, S. G. (2001). Developing creative competence at work: The reciprocal effects of creative thinking, self-efficacy and organizational culture on creative performance. California School of Professional Psychology-Los Angeles
Ployhart, R. E., Weekley, J. A., & Baughman, K. (2006). The structure and function of human capital emergence: A multilevel examination of the attraction-selection-attrition model. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 661-677.
Prince, J. B. (2003). Career opportunity and organizational attachment in a blue-collar unionized environment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(1), 136-150.
Puente-Díaz, R., & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. (2017). Creative self-efficacy: The influence of affective states and social persuasion as antecedents and imagination and divergent thinking as consequences. Creativity Research Journal, 29(3), 304-312.
Richter, A. W., Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Baer, M. (2012). Creative self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: cross-level interactions with team informational resources. Journal of applied psychology, 97(6), 1282.
Richter, G., Raban, D. R., & Rafaeli, S. (2015). Studying gamification: The effect of rewards and incentives on motivation (pp. 21-46). Springer International Publishing.
Royston, R., & Reiter‐Palmon, R. (2019). Creative self‐efficacy as mediator between creative mindsets and creative problem‐solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 472-481.
Schyns, B., & Von Collani, G. (2002). A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational variables. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 11(2), 219-241.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. john wiley & sons.
Shaukat, S., Vishnumolakala, V. R., & Al Bustami, G. (2019). The impact of teachers’ characteristics on their self‐efficacy and job satisfaction: A perspective from teachers engaging students with disabilities. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(1), 68-76.
Shen, J., Benson, J., & Huang, B. (2014). High‐performance work systems and teachers’ work performance: The mediating role of quality of working life. Human Resource Management, 53(5), 817-833.
Shin, Y., & Eom, C. (2014). Team proactivity as a linking mechanism between team creative efficacy, transformational leadership, and risk‐taking norms and team creative performance. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(2), 89-114.
Snape, E., & Redman, T. (2010). HRM practices, organizational citizenship behaviour, and performance: A multi‐level analysis. Journal of management studies, 47(7), 1219-1247.
Subramony, M. (2009). A meta‐analytic investigation of the relationship between HRM bundles and firm performance. Human resource management, 48(5), 745-768.
Tang, G., Yu, B., Cooke, F. L., & Chen, Y. (2017). High-performance work system and employee creativity: The roles of perceived organisational support and devolved management. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1318-1334.
Teng, C. C., Hu, C. M., & Chang, J. H. (2020). Triggering creative self‐efficacy to increase employee innovation behavior in the hospitality workplace. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(4), 912-925.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.
Wang, H., Zhang, Y., & Wan, M. (2022). Linking high‐performance work systems and employee well‐being: A multilevel examination of the roles of organisation‐based self‐esteem and departmental formalisation. Human Resource Management Journal, 32(1), 92-116.
Wastuti, S. N. Y. (2018). Efikasi Diri terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PDAM Tirtanadi Unit Instalasi Pengolahan Air Sunggal. Biblio Couns: Jurnal Kajian Konseling dan Pendidikan, 1(2), 35-42.
Wu, P. C., & Chaturvedi, S. (2009). The role of procedural justice and power distance in the relationship between high performance work systems and employee attitudes: A multilevel perspective. Journal of management, 35(5), 1228-1247.
Yodchai, N., Ly, P. T. M., & Tran, L. T. T. (2022). Co-creating creative self-efficacy to build creative performance and innovation capability for business success: a meta-analysis. Creativity Studies, 15(1),74-88.
Yuan, F. and Woodman, R.W. (2010), “Innovative behaviour in the workplace: the role of performance and image outcome expectations”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 53 No. 2, pp. 323-342.
Zacharatos, A., Barling, J., & Iverson, R. D. (2005). High-performance work systems and occupational safety. Journal of applied psychology, 90(1), 77.